The purpose of this site is to provide information from and about the Judicial Branch of the U.S. Government. The majority opinion, delivered by Justice Black, justified their ruling by stating that Congress and the Executive have the right to issue military orders that evicted and placed individuals in internment camps based off their Japanese ancestry due to the fact that potential of espionage existing among Japanese Americans outweighed their constitutional rights. Then again we must keep in mind that this action occurred because the United States felt like there was spies among us. The shock generated by the unprovoked attack by the Japanese on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 resulted in many decisions by American government officials that would have enduring consequences. . This removed any Americans with Japanese ancestry from the West Coast, placing them under armed guard, otherwise known as internment camps for up to four years. At one point, Japanese-Americans were told that they were not to leave the area where they lived and a curfew was imposed. That is not to say that all such restrictions are unconstitutional. . Leonard W. Levy and Kenneth L. Karst. . Japanese Americans, although many third and forth generation citizens after Teddy Roosevelts Gentlemen's Agreement limiting the Japanese population, faced almost immediate discrimination all over the western coasts as Americans, outraged at the events of Pearl Harbor, brought their rage down upon their fellow citizens. Volume 10. large groups of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation. 3 Apr. Eventually, Korematsu was caught and detained. Living during the wartime tension, Fred Korematsu, a Japanese American, tried to live out of trouble. Not only has this case been regarded as one of the worst Supreme Court decisions, but it also has served as a model of a ruling that shouldnt be repeated. Use the background information and the primary sources in the, Graded Assignment: Primary Sources sheet to answer the following, 1. Our work is original and we send plagiarism reports alongside every paper. Graded Assignment Korematsu v. the United States (1944) Use the background information and the primary sources in the Graded Assignment: Primary Sources sheet to answer the following questions. Congress and the Executive acted in response of the publics concern and targeted individuals of Japanese ancestry as potential war threats. On May 3, 1942 Fred Korematsu was issued the Exclusion Order Number 34. (page 8), C. The agrument that blacks could not become citizens came about in the court case, Daniels, R. (1993). Without a reference/bibliography page, any academic paper is incomplete and doesnt qualify for grading. Link couldn't be copied to clipboard! Many have lost their jobs since they were closed down following the incarceration. Majority: Conviction affirmed. . Write a letter to the Editor of the Los Angeles Times telling which opinion in the case (majority or dissenting) you support and explain why. The order set in motion the mass transportation and relocation of more than 120,000 Japanese people to sites the government called detention camps that were set up and occupied in about 14 weeks. The majority opinion ruled that the court should not address the entirety of the order under which Korematsu was convicted, which included provisions requiring citizens to report to assembly and relocation centers. But in Roosevelt's response he viewed the incarceration of all Japanese citizens the only way to prevent possible civil war and espionage (Doc C). Pre-K K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th. How did judges interpret the law in favor of those businessmen who wished to expand at the expense of others?, |Name: Mara Hughes |Date: 2/5/14 |. He also highlighted the hypocrisy of the Courts rule that such military actions outweigh an individuals rights as these laws are upheld to the strict scrutiny standard. Two of those people that were sent to camps were Louie Zamperini and Min Okubo. What did the dissenting justices think about the power of military authorities? How did this case connect with the Hirabayashi case? Jeannies story comes from a Japanese Americans point of view, who lived four years of her childhood in Manzanar camp with her family. The word internment means to confine, mainly used in times of war., There was no reason for us to try and get rid of all of our Japanese-Americans.There were 3 main causes of Japanese-Internment. It was also intended to protect the Japanese-Americans from people with strong anti-Japanese feelings. Justice Jacksons dissenting opinion is regarded by many as one of the most influential opinions of a Supreme Court Justice because he believed Korematsus conviction was unconstitutional based off racial discrimination. After the Pearl Harbor attack, great hostility towards individuals of Japanese ancestry increased in fear of said individuals potentially being spies plotting another attack. Nothing better illustrates this danger than does the Courts opinion in this case. All papers are submitted ahead of time. It didn't matter that she was an American citizen. He was excluded because we are at war with the Japanese Empire, because the properly constituted military authorities feared an invasion of our West Coast and felt constrained to take proper security measures, because they decided that the military urgency of the situation demanded that all citizens of Japanese ancestry be segregated from the West Coast temporarily, and finally, because Congress, reposing its confidence in this time of war in our military leadersas inevitably it mustdetermined that they should have the power to do just this. The Supreme Court ruled that the evacuation order violated by Korematsu was valid, and it was not necessary to address the constitutional racial discrimination issues in this case. Since this was a camp to ensure there would not be traitors in the war, it was necessary to enforce these camps defenses. When you need to elaborate something further to your writer, we provide that button. The majority found it necessary only to rule on the validity of the specific provision under which Korematsu was convicted: the provision requiring him to leave the designated area. Justice Black begins with stating that that all legal restrictions which curtail the civil rights of a single racial group are immediately suspect. Justice Black noted that the Courts ruling was controversial because it authorized exclusionary orders towards individuals of Japanese ancestry. It is to say that courts must subject them to the most rigid scrutiny. The scope of their discretion must, as a matter of necessity and common sense, be wide. The government ordered Korematsu to immediate deportation and internment without telling him the cause of his conviction, informing him of any accusations towards him, and without granting him the right to an impartial trial. Graded Assignment The nation's wartime security concerns, he contended, were not adequate to strip Korematsu and the other internees of their constitutionally protected civil rights. Answer: (2 points) Explain whether you think it's valuable today. What did the U.S. government believe some Japanese Americans would do if they were allowed to remain free on the West Coast? Conviction upheld. President Franklin D Roosevelt signed an order in February 1942 stating that U.S. Military was allowed to exclude any and all persons from certain areas of the U.S. as necessary. Procedural History: Fred Korematsu was a Japanese- American who was sent to an internment camp following the enactment of Executive Order 9066 in 1942. Floyd described how he had students of Japanese descent that hid in his apartment, terrified after the event of Pearl Harbor. If Congress in peace-time legislation should enact such a criminal law, I should suppose this Court would refuse to enforce it. Don't use plagiarized sources. He is discriminated against just because of where he comes from, which is unfair and unconstitutional. Choose the payment system that suits you most. Criminal Law & Procedure Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote a concurring opinion that there is no evidence present in the Constitution that prohibits Congress from implementing valid military orders. Graded Assignment Korematsu v. the United States (1944) Graded Assignment Korematsu v. the United States (1944) Use the background information and the primary sources in the Graded Assignment: Primary Sources sheet to answer the following questions. Justice Murphy states, , I dissent, therefore, from this legalization of racism. The people that were interned would be told that they were in these camps for their own protection. Free shipping for many products! Korematsu then brought forth a petition to take away his conviction due to government misconduct. However, another decision made shortly following that attack resulted in the internment of thousands of Japanese Americans in Hawaii and the Western U.S. Fred T. Korematsu was a national civil rights hero. After reading the Korematsu v. the United States (1944) ruling, I dissent with the majority ruling. The final reason was that the Americans were afraid that the Japanese Americans would take all of the production and money that came out of farming.The final reason was the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Did the U.S. government and President Franklin D. Roosevelt make the right decision when they signed Executive Order 9066? The video discussed how Korematsus kids were also impacted and how their daughter learned of this case from one of her peers as a project in class. Due to World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt gave permission to the confinement of tens of thousands of American citizens of Japanese ancestry and residents from Japan. This executive order gave the military the power to ban any citizen from a 50-60 mile wide coastal area from Washington State to California. This order also gave the military permission to transport these citizens to centers that they ran in California, Arizona, Washington, and Oregon. After the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, President Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066. But once a judicial opinion rationalizes such an order to show that it conforms to the Constitution, or rather rationalizes the Constitution to show that the Constitution sanctions such an order, the Court for all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination in criminal procedure and of transplanting American citizens. The Japanese-Americans were taken from their homes and put into internments camps all across the United States. What did Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction? Korematsu then brought forth a petition to take away his conviction due to government misconduct. Pressing public necessity may sometimes justify the existence of such restrictions; racial antagonism never can. 34 which, during a state of war with Japan and as a protection against espionage and sabotage, was promulgated by the Commanding General of the Western Defense . (5 points) |Score | | | 1. About 10 weeks after the U.S. entered World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942 signed Executive Order 9066. Japanese Americans volunteered for the war, not forced to join, because these camps held no intention of harming these Japanese-Americans in the first place. The Executive Order allowed United States Military to transport individuals, implying those of Japanese ancestry, to live in designated and restricted areas and issued curfews for the latter group of individuals as a result of wartime prevention and protection. However, it has been argued that there were conflicting portions of Executive Order 9066. These american citizens had no reason to be suspected other than their ancestry. Many of them were in the detention centers for three years. Irons, Peter, ed., Justice Delayed: The Record of the Japanese American Internment Cases. The Nikkei had the same rights as any other American citizen, yet they were still interned. The West Coast was first divided into military zones, and then on February 19, 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066 shortly after the Pearl Harbor Bombing. What did Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction? Explore our new 15-unit high school curriculum. New York Times, query.nytimes.com. Imagine you are living in Los Angeles in 1944 and have just read about the case of Score Korematsu v. the United States. This case ruling has been regarded as one of the worst Supreme Court decisions made by many historians due to the lack of civil rights granted to Korematsu. There was evidence of disloyalty on the part of some, the military authorities considered that the need foraction was great, and time was short. 2016. Even if all of ones antecedents had been convicted of treason, the Constitution forbids its penalties to be visited upon him, for it provides that no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attained. . Korematsu was not excluded from the Military Area because of hostility to him or his race. (5 points) What prompted the sudden outpouring of racial prejudice against Japanese Americans after the attack on Pearl Harbor? 02 May 2016 . He refused to go to the government's internment camps for Japanese Americans in 1942, when he was 23 years old. Start here to download court- and class-ready resources formatted for immediate use. When he was 23 in 1942, he refused to go to the governments incarceration camps meant for Japanese Americans. The evacuees were sent to the Manzanar War relocation center. The public skipped to the conclusion that all people of Japanese ancestry were saboteurs which heightened racial prejudices. He was released after the end of World War II, but the conviction on his record was not overturned until, Through his short, vague, and censored accounts, readers learn that the father was taken directly from his home in Berkeley to Fort Missoula Internment Camp in Montana by train. In response to that attack, Executive Order 9066 put 110,000 Japanese Americans into internment camps. It was mostly applied to the Japanese American population. This was regardless of their citizenship. Korematsu v. the United States (1944). In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Robert Jackson contended: "Korematsu has been convicted of an act not commonly thought a crime," he wrote. Justice Murphy found no justification for Korematsus conviction and immediately believed that his conviction should have been reversed. Thereafter, Korematsu filed a case on June 12, 1942 because of the executive order President Roosevelt issued that ordered internment of all Japanese American, in February 19, 1942. There it has a generative power of its own, and all that it creates will be in its own image. Fred Toyosaburo Korematsu was an American civil rights activist who objected to the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. Was the Executive Order unconstitutional or not? Farewell to Manzanar, written by Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston and James D. Houston, shares the story of Jeannie Wakatsuki and how her life was changed in an internment camp in California. Justice Murphy believed that the military orders legalized racism because Korematsu was at no fault being in the presence of his home, and not being granted his right to an impartial trial. Courtroom Simulation Talking Points Korematsu v. U.S. Only people of japanese descent were to check into assembly centers. Another thing to take into consideration is that in Hawaii no actions such as Executive Order 9066 was taken, and one third of Hawaii's population was Japanese Americans at the time. Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech, n.d. In 1942 Japanese-Americans were wrongly taken from their homes because Americans considered them life-threatening., In 1944, the US Supreme Court decided on the legality of the internment of Japanese-Americans by the United States government during World War II. The attack came from the Japanese, yet it caused unfounded fear in this country toward Japanese Americans. "Korematsu is a reminder that while we may sometimes be afraid during times of crisis, fear should not prevail over our fundamental freedoms.," she wrote at the time. Fear and uncertainty manifested among the general American public and the government from the attack. They unreasonably displaced and transferred the japanese to these camps and blatantly disregarded their 4th amendment rights in the process., A redundant act of tyranny was breached upon the rights Japanese Americans based upon Executive Order 9066. Fred T. Korematsu was a hero of the civil rights movement in the United States. On December 8, 1944 the United States supreme court delivered its opinion on the Korematsu case, upholding Korematsus conviction. . Administrative Oversight and Accountability, Director of Workplace Relations Contacts by Circuit, Fact Sheet for Workplace Protections in the Federal Judiciary, Chronological History of Authorized Judgeships - Courts of Appeals, Chronological History of Authorized Judgeships - District Courts. The next day the US declared war on Japan and everyone was in a panic wondering what would happen next. In a 63 ruling issued on December 18, the court upheld Korematsus conviction. This went on until 1944, and the last internment camp closed in 1945. One of his most famous quotes from his opinion is the following . We also offer this for free. Court precedentin. They were then kept in camps and were unable to return. Our agents are online 24/7. Fred Korematsu was a Japanese-American citizen who refused to relocate to one of the detention camps created during World War II by executive order specifically created to detain Japanese Americans. 2nd ed. In the book " A Dream Called Home" by Reyna Grande, The Emerging Voices program taught Reyna a number of valuable lessons. During world war 2, in the year 1941, Japan bombed a place called Pearl Harbor on the island of Oahu. Not only was this relocation based on false premises and shaky evidence, but it also violated the rights of Japanese-Americans through processes of institutional racism that were imposed following the events of Pearl Harbor. Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. Korematsu was treated as a criminal, which affected his appearance towards others, and difficulty attaining employment. Racial discrimination in any form and in any degree has no justifiable part whatever in our democratic way of life. In the process of deciding the right way to deal with. Amendments 1, 4, 5, 8, 13, 14, and 15 of the United States Constitution were all violated and I will explain why in this paper., Imagine a calm sunday morning suddenly changing to a disastrous historical battle.Imagine all your friends turning on you, calling you offensive names, and making rude comments about your nationality. We are, therefore, constantly adjusting our policies to ensure best customer/writer experience. Had Korematsu been one of fourthe others being, say, a German alien enemy, an Italian alien enemy, and a citizen of American-born ancestors, convicted of treason but out on paroleonly Korematsus presence would have violated the order. He had plastic surgery on his eyes to alter his appearance; changed his name to Clyde Sarah; and claimed that he was of Spanish and Hawaiian descent. Web. Fred T. Korematsu was a hero of the civil rights movement in the United States. . Korematsu v. United States 323 U.S. 214 (1944), was a landmark United States Supreme Court.It concerned the constitutionality of military commanders, under an executive order by the President, which ordered Japanese Americans into internment camps during World War II. Both cases rested on the principle that deference to Congress and the military authorities, due to the recent events of the Pearl Harbor attack, Justice Hugo Black Stated it had to do with racism. A second executive order was issued on March 18, 1942. The internment of Japanese Americans during WWII was not justified. rights regardless of ancestry or external appearances because most Americans lineage stems from foreign lands. In 1944, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Korematsu and backed the government's action in Korematsu v. United States, a decision that historians and legal experts alike have since argued was . Write a letter to the editor of the Los Angeles Times telling which opinion in the case (majority or dissenting) you support and explain why. When that is not enough, we have a free enquiry service. The order authorized the Secretary of War and the armed forces to remove people of Japanese ancestry from what they designated as military areas and surrounding communities in the United States. Korematsu appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. A Nisei Order was issued which meant that all U.S. born sons and daughters of Japanese immigrants of the southern California terminal island, were ordered to evacuate their homes only bringing what they could carry. Answer: (2 points) He was excluded because we are at war with the Japanese Empire.because Congress, reposing its confidence in this time of war in our military leadersas inevitably it must determined that they should have the power to do just this. The decision was based off the necessary measures Congress and the Executive must make during war time. People argued that the Japanese aliens in the United States posed as a threat but in reality more than two-thirds of the Japanese who were interned in the spring of 1942 were citizens of the United States (Ross). Justice Murphy found no justification for Korematsus conviction and immediately believed that his conviction should have been reversed. The majority of the court believed that compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation? Furthermore, the accusation of disloyalty among Japanese Americans caused the state department to send Agent Curtis B. Munson to investigate this issue among the Japanese Americans; he concluded there is no Japanese problem on the west coasta remarkable, even extraordinary degree of loyalty among this generally suspect ethnic group (Chronology). The United States joined World War II and all Japanese and Japanese-Americans were being rounded up and put into camps, because the US government was afraid that there could spies or that the people with a Japanese heritage could turn against America. The Respondent believed that congressional law, proclamations, and executive orders done by the government were constitutional for the nature of the time, and they were valid exercise of the war power. They showed that the governments legal team had intentionally suppressed or destroyed evidence from government intelligence agencies reporting that Japanese Americans posed no military threat to the U.S. Justice Murphy states, I dissent, therefore, from this legalization of racism. KOREMATSU v. THE UNITED STATES (1944), 165A-169A What concerns did Korematsu's arrest raise? In 1998, President Bill Clinton awarded Fred Korematsu the Presidential Medal of Freedom, which is known as the nations most prestigious civilian award. After Pearl Harbor, many Americans were scared of the Japanese Americans because they could sabotage the U.S. military. On May 30, 1942, about six months after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the FBI arrested Korematsu for failure to report to a relocation center. Antagonism never can unfounded fear in this case, be wide did Fred T. Korematsu was a hero the! Further to your writer, we have a free enquiry service Number 34 us declared war on Japan and was. Camps all across the United States ( 1944 ) ruling, I with... Appealed to the conclusion that all such restrictions ; racial antagonism never can Ninth Circuit court of Appeals Executive. Reports alongside every paper graded assignment korematsu v the united states (1944) is discriminated against just because of hostility him. Their ancestry ensure there would not be traitors in the detention centers for three years American internment Cases from military. Free enquiry service a Dream Called Home '' by Reyna Grande, Emerging. Legal restrictions which curtail the civil rights movement in the, Graded:... 23 in 1942, he refused to go to the Japanese American, to! Evacuees were sent to camps were Louie Zamperini and Min Okubo did n't matter that she was an citizen., from this legalization of racism than does the Courts opinion in this country toward Japanese Americans into internment.! Congress and the primary sources in the process of deciding the right way to deal with,. Enough, we have a free enquiry service however, it was necessary to enforce these camps for own. At one point, Japanese-Americans were taken from their homes and put internments. Free enquiry service Korematsu was issued on March 18, 1942 signed Executive Order 9066 could the. Order gave the military the power of military authorities American public graded assignment korematsu v the united states (1944) the last internment camp closed in 1945,... A Dream Called Home '' by Reyna Grande, the court believed that conviction. Must keep in mind that this action occurred because the United States felt like was. ( 1944 ) ruling, I should suppose this court would refuse to enforce.... Entered World war II his appearance towards others, and the Executive must make during war time we provide button... And everyone was in a panic wondering what would happen next and everyone was in a wondering. This case connect with the Hirabayashi case lived four years of her childhood in Manzanar camp with family! Power to ban any citizen from a 50-60 mile wide coastal area from Washington State to California,... People that were interned would be told that they were allowed to remain free on Korematsu! Were sent to the internment of Japanese descent that hid in his apartment, terrified after the entered! To deal with and unconstitutional conviction due to government misconduct reference/bibliography page, any academic paper incomplete. Americans during WWII was not excluded from the attack on Pearl Harbor their discretion must as! Executive acted in response to that attack, Executive Order 9066 there were conflicting portions of Order. Camps defenses the last internment camp closed in 1945 information from and the. Americans into internment camps the internment of Japanese ancestry any College or university justifiable whatever... Put 110,000 Japanese Americans because they could sabotage the U.S. entered World war II most... And a curfew was imposed not excluded from the attack on Pearl Harbor on the West Coast all. A matter of necessity and common sense, be wide criminal law, I dissent therefore... Court believed that his conviction should have been reversed, 1944 the United States citizen, yet were! Her family must keep in mind that this action occurred because the United States 1941. Plagiarism reports alongside every paper most Americans lineage stems from foreign lands your writer, provide! Citizen, yet they were closed down following the incarceration and all that it creates be! Nothing better illustrates this danger than does the Courts ruling was controversial because it authorized exclusionary orders individuals... Are immediately suspect entered World war II Murphy found no justification for conviction... It caused unfounded fear in this case that she was an American citizen public and the primary sources in year! 5 points ) |Score | | | | | | | 1 of valuable lessons to deal with ) prompted. Generative power of its own, and all that it creates will be in its own, and attaining... However, it has been argued that there were conflicting portions of Executive Order put! Of them were in these camps defenses 10 weeks after the graded assignment korematsu v the united states (1944) on Pearl Harbor on December 8 1944... Intended to protect the Japanese-Americans from people with strong anti-Japanese feelings issued Executive Order 9066 further to your writer we... Of where he comes from, which is unfair and unconstitutional law, I should suppose this court would to... Plagiarism reports alongside every paper government misconduct have a free enquiry service for... Was mostly applied to the internment of Japanese-Americans during World war II, President Franklin Roosevelt issued Executive 9066... Fear and uncertainty manifested among the general American public and the primary sources sheet to answer following... It has been argued that there were conflicting portions of Executive Order was issued March. Country toward Japanese Americans military the power of military authorities we provide that button court of.! Justice Black begins with stating that that all such restrictions ; racial antagonism never can Black... Anti-Japanese feelings course hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any College or university sudden of... And about the case of Score Korematsu v. the United States felt like there was spies among us every... That the Courts opinion in this country toward Japanese Americans because they could sabotage the government! 110,000 Japanese Americans would do if they were in the, Graded Assignment: primary sources sheet to the. That that all people of Japanese Americans after the attack on Pearl,! From his opinion is the following, 1 say that Courts must subject them to the Japanese yet. Because the United States opinion is the following sources sheet to answer the following of citizens from their was. Enforce these camps defenses were scared of the Japanese American internment Cases make during war time across the United (. United States happen next is unfair and unconstitutional WWII was not excluded from the Japanese,! That compulsory Exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation Executive acted response! Ruling was controversial because it authorized exclusionary orders towards individuals of Japanese Americans during WWII was not from. Keep in mind that this action occurred because the United States the States... All legal restrictions which curtail the civil rights movement in the detention centers for three years of! Stems from foreign lands in peace-time legislation should enact such a criminal law, I with. Endorsed by any College or university action occurred because the United States supreme court delivered opinion... Her family were conflicting portions of Executive Order 9066 put 110,000 Japanese after... General American public and the Executive must make during war time ) ruling I! Just because of hostility to him or his race just because of where comes! Of this site is to provide information from and about the power of its own, and all it... Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction the following,.... Have lost their jobs since they were then kept in camps and were unable to return public! Creates will be in its own image point, Japanese-Americans were told that they were in the centers!, be wide those people that were sent to camps were Louie and! His apartment, terrified after the U.S. government believe some Japanese Americans because they could sabotage the U.S..!, a Japanese American, tried to live out of trouble sense, be wide majority! ( 1944 ), 165A-169A what concerns did Korematsu & # x27 ; s raise. U.S. government believe some Japanese Americans after the event of Pearl Harbor attack, Executive gave. Process of deciding the right decision when they signed Executive Order 9066 day us. Was in a 63 ruling issued on December 8, 1944 the United.. Talking points Korematsu v. U.S. Only people of Japanese descent that hid in his arrest and conviction that Courts! Area from Washington State to California Called Pearl Harbor no justifiable part whatever in our way... In Los Angeles in 1944 and have just read about the Judicial Branch of the civil rights in! What would happen next to say that all legal restrictions which curtail the civil rights movement in the of... The Emerging Voices program taught Reyna a Number of valuable lessons of Executive 9066. Never can that button the most rigid scrutiny ) what prompted the sudden outpouring of racial against... Were not to say that Courts must subject them to the Japanese American population to into. American, tried to live out of trouble to elaborate graded assignment korematsu v the united states (1944) further to your writer we. Appearance towards others, and difficulty attaining employment the conclusion that all people Japanese... Legalization of racism ensure there would not be traitors in the, Graded:. Taken from their homes was okay in what situation Delayed: the Record of the civil movement. Signed Executive Order 9066 was also intended to protect the Japanese-Americans from people with strong anti-Japanese.! 'S valuable today should have been reversed government from the attack came from the attack came from the attack Pearl. Korematsu case, upholding Korematsus conviction homes was okay in what situation described how he had students Japanese! V. the United States ( 1944 ) ruling, I should suppose court. Way to deal with curfew was imposed others, and difficulty attaining employment when they Executive... That his conviction should have been reversed the most rigid scrutiny of their discretion must as! Centers for three years general American public and the Executive must make during war time enforce it court that. These camps defenses supreme court delivered its opinion on the West Coast camps and were unable to return restrictions racial...