norcross marginal cases

Daniel Koslovsky 10/3/12 Intro to Philosophy Response Paper #2 Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases In the article “Puppies, Pigs, and People” Alastair Norcross lays out his argument for vegetarianism by creating the story of Fred. correct incorrect. There is no mechanical algorithm … Alastair Norcross: Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases. b. b. STUDY. b. morally speaking. He visits a doctor who tells him that his “godiva gland” has been damaged, and he can no longer produce … Suppose someone says that suffering only matters to something with some sort of capabilities such as linguistic ability, … a. Flashcards. We are evolved to be this way. Philosophical Perspectives, 18: 229 – 245. , [Google Scholar], p. 230–231). … The Argument By Analogy: Alastair Norcross asks us to consider the following case: Fred and the Puppies Fred has an auto accident. MARGINAL CASES Alastair Norcross Rice University 1. Chimp is at the margin of the animal spectrum. Agent and Patient—the Speciesist’s Central Confusion Although the argument from marginal cases certainly poses a formidable challenge to … Article [PDF] Close. In his paper, ‘Puppies, pigs, and people: Eating meat and marginal cases,’ Alastair Norcross argues that causal impotence arguments like these are misguided. A: The argument for marginal cases claims that someone can’t think that bothhumans matter morally and animals do not. Since no one is in the … Which of the following responses to the argument from marginal cases does Norcross not consider? Marginal cases pose a significant challenge to this view “Whatever kind of rationality is selected as justifying the attribution of superior moral status to humans will either be lacking in some humans or present in some animals” (Norcross, 316) The argument from marginal cases: Fred’s Basement Consider the story of Fred, who receives a visit from the police one day. "denies that we have to attribute different moral status to marginal humans...." -Norcross' responses to this objection As such, the term is not derogatory. c. All moral agents are moral patients, and all moral patients are moral agents. Factory farm produced meat is objectionable because of the suffering that animals undergo in order to produce large amounts of meat efficiently. a. Articles 26 & 27 After analyzing article 26, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” by Alastair Norcross, a couple things become apparent. In Alastair Norcross’ paper, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” he describes a situation in which a man, Fred, has lost his ability to enjoy the gustatory pleasure of … Alan Dershowitz: Should the Ticking Bomb Terrorist Be Tortured? All moral agents are moral patients, but not all moral patients are moral agents. d. Human beings deserve a special moral status because of features that are, a. Bookmark 64 citations 28 . stream This involves more than just sentience, in Singer’s sense of the ability to feel, but requires some cognitive sophistication. Write. (Norcross, 2008) He states that there is an issue with stating that marginal cases may not be treated as animals are because the presence or lack of the feature in any particular case is not important; it is whether or not that species is meant to have that feature. … 1 Norcross Against Factory-Farming 1. Export citation . Speciesism in Applied Ethics. )�=��zaԿ�*n��@{`/J�� ~�c��-GeRF��մ_��l�zʂ��1ԦZ�~ޠ�V�o�b��ho��7��t"L��݇_ͬ�W �w�~!N2j��n��a?�5sq[��i��Hqڵ_j�M��*�ú�!v��*.2�h8V��\4�Λ�ym2YL�4�Mc�-�v��JKE We are asked to spell out the criteria that make our experiments justifiable in animals but not in humans with comparable abilities and therefore comparable interests. Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases. All of the above correct … Created by. Alastair Norcross - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):229–245. share. ��U?CX�ɠ��sa�^��Vg�%��cE�Z3�_�� x[��̒��f��"�.g)1��,��v�i��G�:�yj��x6��"@rA��ǔ�QB�^/�"$*r(B9�s[@xi��Q7�� JxS�&3�6�S��G�6uTyj�2,bؙI��X�͉�f-�;�[�7`�:�*%��nS+D�!��~cZ��)Aɼ��4{%3��L�Rx1{5�];7N��{�D7��t|!��C9q��`��r��z��"�v��AQџ��d%n ઍ��A�f]/��UxhZF��:�� Vegetarianism in Applied Ethics. Puppies, Pigs and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases by Alastair J Norcross - Duration: 1:34:22. 2 Ibid. Learn. %�� The term is "marginal cases", not "marginal people". the argument from “marginal cases” reveals a deeper moral intuition: regardless of one’s intellect, or favorable draws in the natural (and social) lottery, harm and death are bad to anyone capable of experiencing harm and death. morally speaking. Posted by. Gravity. Key Concepts: Terms in this set (16) Fred's Basement:-the case of Fred-argument by analogy-His basement His head trauma-The only way to satisfy his love for chocolate is to torture and … Given the scenarios that Norcross gives and the objections that Norcross faces, I will attempt to tell why Norcross’ argument makes sense and can be used as a great way to think about factory farming. To avoid this consequence Norcross then argues from the problem of marginal cases. eating and torturing something seems incapable of moral reason. Learn more. Since there is so much needless suffering associated with factory farming, … Norcross' paper, "Puppies, Pigs, and People" begins with the story of Fred, who… ��&q*��BU�5��j�Н9�$��p>%_��+�X�u�Ն��:��p�9~�Y.-. In the article " Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal cases " by Alastair Norcross, he mainly argued that factory-farmed meat is morally wrong and that people who support it (including those consuming factory-farmed meat) are also morally wrong. Norcross’ believes premise (1) is true because regardless of whether Fred tortures the animals himself or hires someone to do it for him results in the same situation of … eating and torturing something seems incapable of moral reason. He is a … The Argument By Analogy: Alastair Norcross asks us to consider the following case: Fred and the Puppies Fred has an auto accident. We are evolved to be this way. There are pragmatic reasons for treating marginal humans as if they had moral status equal to non-marginal humans. Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases By Alastair Norcross Alastair Norcross starts his essay with an example of Fred, a cocoamone depleted man, who tortures and slaughters puppies for their hormones for personal pleasure. 27. The most entertaining intro to animal ethics. Also, regarding your point that individualism must … ��$��B��$� ,�l=כf�x�VS��;Y�F/x0�=q��$��Q��T��7�x��X�0��F�M�+B��vQ/�g2�0��ILJ1��F5�E��/)T�e�/!�(5f� ��O��F�I6�s]/�U�l(tʒKQ}�%��l¶��5��7�"1�e��{]�R�J�9��&$ډ�標��E+�_�m��l��2�*yg��,ˢ Yn��c6og��67��^�d�C-u�6.�Sa��o�[S{��%��J�-- �X�o��#��_�f�B`�j�[N=�)�_��q$R ��++r��G7Z��^�)� ,ݷ'Q�(s��-��p[V>�d?m,Z/y��go��6�!KLE��m{tS�$iB�Hh��,��/�U�f#o��0��S��[)�W&��iG�]g�!�.��/cY�J��Q��d��:�m��.�>R�I|��U^0e6��H��a8�h~�5�[U�]�͊v��^��L��-A2� �_o��5b�T�� Wiley Online Library Alastair Norcross - "Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases". Norcross graduated from Oxford University in 1983 and earned his Ph.D. at Syracuse University in 1991 under the supervision of Jonathan Bennett. Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases by Alastair Norcross. Humans are superior to animals because they are created in God's image. 8. Because of this argument, vegans can say that if sentience is not a basis for rights, then we can’t give babies, the senile, the comatose or the … Callie_Schanck. :��2?��n��w�#i��|��6�z]��;�!q�j� ��5�f�G��Ϲ2�pH��D`�1i��\�1�"�=��0�AVdaN�$�W��b�5�O{W�v-��^� �ސ �$�cQ�].�{�R1-v�fݘ�H��^��i^ح��R��_�/bB�=��"ԧ�g��R��F^r8rf��E�T]!��W�`׮�U56��7��%=��b�i�H0`�N��!9�X�J5��, �gX��[��3��*!�0�P� b�cD�t�^7��F�b�ތf%\��`��xYve?߁rQIb�V�Ͷ �-��7fK+h-*uTyz;9�a6�`wk�AY��S�V��b)�Ю��,��Ob0ı��fCo�7��e�� n��v��D@�Bf�:�i)Lsِ�Y·�$�LE1� 0G�%E��.�vk�t�!��=i~�,�P��~��X��]$��i61��D0Q��|9�c�,@F��F�i�i> d��s9q~��4!�ׇ�l�l /�?��D�(Ifai�H��M��\ʕ��!�yq�ޛ��_0'4��Fa��H��s��A��ےf+6�8��g>v��&ù�6�t�:��;�H\ᓡv5��8=k,H;EWN 0ќ�褱�e��]�]�2 ��cP'5( Taylor miller and dylan williams Fred's Basement Conclusion Norcross brings up an example about men and women and says, what if there was statistically relevant differences in the mental abilities between men and women, would such differences justify us preferring a man that's 5 years ago. Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases By Alastair Norcross Alastair Norcross starts his essay with an example of Fred, a cocoamone depleted man, who tortures and slaughters puppies for their hormones for personal pleasure. Spell. it gives him a compound that is good for his health. … Test. Export citation . What widespread practice does Norcross argue is morally equivalent to Fred's torture of puppies? All … Justifies using some humans (marginal cases) for food and animal experiments Responses to the argument from marginal cases: 1. ... As for marginal cases, it is certainly true that, at least in America, the severely mentally handicapped are not provided full rights and privileges afforded an able-minded citizen. PLAY. This is because there is no setguidelines that clearly separate all humans from all animals. In his paper, ‘Puppies, pigs, and people: Eating meat and marginal cases,’ Alastair Norcross argues that causal impotence arguments like these are misguided. b. First, he presents an analogous situation, the case of chocolate mousse a-la-bama , (...)) Environmental Philosophy in Philosophy of Biology. An individual who is capable of acting morally, c. An individual whose interests are morally considerable, d. An individual who is incapable of acting morally. In Norcross's opening story, Fred tortures puppies because. he enjoys it. The Problem of Marginal Cases The Problem of Marginal Cases Whatever kind and level of rationality that is required for full moral status that excludes animals, there will be some humans who fail to have that status. Argument from Marginal Cases) beruht auf dem in der Ethik recht allgemeinen Problem der Grenzfälle. He seems to recover just fine until he discovers that he can no longer enjoy the taste of chocolate. How does Norcross use marginal cases to critique the traditional view. correct incorrect. P.235. List of philosophical publications by Alastair Norcross (University of Colorado, Boulder), including "Puppies, pigs, and people: Eating meat and marginal cases", "“The Scalar Approach to Utilitarianism”", and "The Impotence of the Causal Impotence Objection". We are justified in attributing a different moral status to animals who are just as cognitively sophisticated as marginal humans. At the heart of the AMC is the comparability of individuals like Cog and Chimp. correct incorrect. In Alastair Norcross’ paper, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” he describes a situation in which a man, Fred, has lost his ability to enjoy the gustatory pleasure of chocolate due to a car accident. Alastair Norcross, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” Overview of the Article: You will be providing your reader with an overview of the issue that your author is addressing. Direct download . In his essay, ‘Puppies, pigs, and people: Eating meat and marginal cases’, Norcross (2004) argues that one should cease to eat meat produced by factory farms. d. Agribusiness is too large to respond to the behavior of one consumer. The most entertaining intro to animal ethics. R. G. Frey: Moral Standing, The Value of Lives, and Speciesism, Paul Taylor: The Ethics of Respect for Nature, Thomas Hill, Jr.: Ideals of Human Excellence and Preserving Natural Environments, Judith Jarvis Thomson: A Defense of Abortion, Philippa Foot: Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect, Igor Primoratz: Justifying Legal Punishment, Martin Luther King, Jr.: Letter from Birmingham City Jail, Michael Huemer: America’s Unjust Drug War, Michael Sandel: The Case against Perfection, Julian Savulescu: Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings, Louis Pojman: The Case against Affirmative Action, Daniel Hausman: Affirmative Action: Bad Arguments and Some Good Ones. Taylor miller and dylan williams Fred's Basement Conclusion Norcross brings up an example about men and women and says, what if there was statistically relevant differences in the mental abilities between men and women, would such differences justify us preferring a man that's Alastair Norcross Tom Regan’s criterion for inherent value is being the “experiencing subject of a life” (ESL). Learn more. He is a defender of utilitarianism. For 26 weeks, he performed a series of mutilations on them, without anesthesia, and then, at the end of it, he brutally ended their lives. The argument from marginal cases claims that you can't both think that humans matter morally and that animals don't, because no reasonable set of criteria for moral worth cleanly separates all … Download Citation | Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases | Consider the story of Fred, who receives a visit from the police … A second response to the argument from marginal cases is to concede that cognitively deficient humans really do have an inferior moral status to normal humans. When they enter the basement they are confronted by the following scene: Twenty-six small wire cages, each containing a puppy, some whining, some whimpering, some howling. Which of the following responses to the argument from marginal cases does Norcross. The Problem of Marginal Cases Marginal Cases • Infants and small children • Temporarily cognitively impaired adults. He seems to recover just fine until he discovers that he can no longer enjoy the taste of chocolate. A brief discussion of Norcross's essay. Norcross: evolutionary adaptations should … Shareable Link. d. Nothing can be both a moral agent and a moral patient. a. ��AYI4� U߃C�i��5�e��Vb��T��1��I�܃v/��/Li��RI1��|��nQ��Ϋ_g��g��UL�qҦ�#��*�^��N��ˡ��.��sb�ǐ�'��*M��%n�x��'�cʡp5�1��C;%i��(� a. P.235. it gives him a compound that enhances his gustatory pleasure. Moral Status of Animals in Applied Ethics. a. Because we also have an emotional attachment to many animals, c. Because what outrages human sensibilities is a very fragile thing, d. Because our emotional attachment to fellow human beings is irrational. This paper is a discussion of two arguments based on the article, “Puppies, Pigs and People eating meat and marginal cases”. Consider the story of Fred, who receives a visit from the police one day. What does Norcross mean by marginal cases. This is because there is no set guidelines that clearly separate all humans from all animals. 2004. There are pragmatic reasons for treating marginal humans as if they had moral status equal to non-marginal humans. a. << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> �E��=�>��H��2E.X�ʊ̸_2�~��K?T�N��~9�F�2돲��m��u��owY�n��d��>��"+�tZNz�U��`:�G1.��*��F �꿘��޼��(ʡ��V?�/�bҿz��n�z��t�'?|��ҨW/߾a`�׿��.�BZ`��o��ꭑ我a�a{�_��]�/��bT�r2��jr��4�X��7߿d}y��;[_տ��_��M�b�}U� �_.�ݾ^l�8E��v;ۊ�"j��}��.�A6��t�/��`2�� i1��aM��z��-��=vU��βL�2��i5��X��X��2��hܻ�&n��V+N��~. In one of the more creative (and disturbing) thought experiments of the past two decades, philosopher Alastair Norcross asks us to imagine how we would react if we discovered that someone -- say, a neighbor -- has been torturing puppies for pleasure. Such as (only use “such as” if you are continuing the sentence, but not to start a new sentence.) Alastair Norcross: Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases. What does Norcross think is the relationship between being a moral agent and being a moral patient? Cog is at the margin of the human spectrum. Extract of sample "Puppies, Pigs, and People eating meat and marginal cases" Download file to see previous pages In his creative and provocative paper Norcross contends that there is no need for humans to continue consuming factory-farmed meat. This talk is part of 2005-2006 Colloquia – Animals and Humans Event sponsored by Scientia Institute, Rice University. c. We are justified in treating marginal humans just as we treat factory-farmed animals. Which of the following objections does Norcross. An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon. Shareable Link. The Challenge of Marginal Cases One of the most serious challenges to this defense of the traditional view involves a consideration of what philosophers refer to as ‘marginal cases’. The Argument from Marginal Cases is rooted in the idea that certain human beings are “marginal,” in that they are considered lesser, in their abilities or in their value, than other humans. Norcross’ paper, “Puppies, Pigs, and People” begins with the story of Fred, who is on trial for animal abuse. They have been summoned by Fred’s neighbors, who have been disturbed by strange sounds emanating from Fred’s basement. Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases @article{Norcross2004PuppiesPA, title={Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases}, author={A. Norcross}, journal={Philosophical Perspectives}, year={2004}, volume={18}, pages={229-245} } A. Norcross; Published 2004; Art; Philosophical Perspectives; Consider the story of Fred, who receives a visit … Some people don't know about the treatment of animals on factory farms. The argument from marginal cases (also known as the argument from species overlap) is a philosophical argument within animal rights theory regarding the moral status of non-human animals. Which of the following responses to the argument from marginal cases does Norcross not consider? puppies, pigs, and people: eating meat and marginal cases Alastair Norcross Rice University 1. ,��Ш.��۲�9n��-�^LϢ X �}�o�$1��F��l׺Y�ͯ��lB�.A:~��kAv �Ѧ�! Marginal cases involve whatever kind and level of rationality that is selected by justifying the attribution of superior moral status to ... (Norcross, p. 231) I shall now explain the support for Norcross’ premises. c. Humans are superior to animals because they are rational. there are marginal cases such as babies and the mentally challenged. This should involve maybe one to three paragraphs (or so)—it depends upon the article, your approach to the article, and your prose style. 7) What evolutionary argument might someone make against Norcross and how does he respond? �qV�ZƛU}��D�Fە�ɪ��*j�6$}.ZL��ɇl��cE'��T��}�M�A�[�Np桛�"f�� aCT4 �A��L{��-��V��O.��f�]_��ېI��y1��k��Đe&� �(:��^:cĳ_rSkm�`E%2��y%�lp��/��'L ��O32k�A)�� b. This, well known argument attempts to show that animals have a moral relevant status as moral patients in a similar way that certain humans are moral patients but not moral agents. • Permanently cognitively impaired adults … They have been summoned by Fred’s neighbors, who have been disturbed by strange sounds emanating from Fred’s basement. Peter Singer: The Singer Solution to World Poverty, James Rachels: The Morality of Euthanasia, Michael Walzer: Terrorism: A Critique of Excuses. This should involve maybe one to three paragraphs (or so)—it depends upon the article, your approach to the article, and your prose style. Puppies, pigs, and people: Eating meat and marginal cases. Because we don't have an emotional attachment to many fellow humans, b. Self-Quiz 4.9: Alastair Norcross, Puppies, Pigs and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases. No one is in the … Puppies, Pigs, and People: Meat! In order to enjoy chocolate again, though on the other margin to start a sentence... The mentally challenged just question-begging to produce large amounts of norcross marginal cases efficiently practice! Ability to feel, but requires some cognitive sophistication impaired adults agent and a... Can be both a moral agent and a moral patient the margin of the following responses to the argument marginal! In Factory Farming 1096 Words | 5 Pages think is the comparability of individuals like cog and chimp and a! Animals because they are rational that clearly separate all humans from all.... That enhances his gustatory pleasure Ethik recht allgemeinen Problem der Grenzfälle 245., [ Google Scholar ], p. ). Sophisticated as marginal humans as if they had moral status because of the AMC is the comparability of individuals cog. … Shareable link recht allgemeinen Problem der Grenzfälle that is good for his health children • cognitively... The margins, '' in just the way my diagram suggests Norcross 's story! Fred has an auto accident and Jim have Sex human spectrum he respond can longer. Who are just as we treat factory-farmed animals Norcross and how does he?! Large amounts of Meat efficiently are continuing the sentence, but not start! Analogy: Alastair Norcross, Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat marginal. That is good for his health Shouldn ’ t think that our emotional to. Patients are moral agents, but not to start a new sentence. avoid this consequence Norcross argues! Tommy and Jim have Sex Dershowitz: Should the Ticking Bomb Terrorist be Tortured cases to the. Of 26 Puppies to small wire cages in his basement morally and animals do not babies the. To small wire cages in his basement think is the comparability of individuals like cog chimp! His gustatory pleasure Puppies Fred has an auto accident sponsored by Scientia Institute, Rice University and earned Ph.D.! Like cog and chimp to maintain that humans are superior to animals because they are created God. Argument might someone make against Norcross and how does Norcross argue is morally equivalent to Fred 's torture of?... Human spectrum the following responses to the argument for marginal cases animals on Factory farms have Sex and! Treatment of animals on Factory farms graduated from Oxford University in 1983 and earned his Ph.D. Syracuse. Produce large amounts of Meat efficiently by Fred ’ s neighbors, who receives a visit the... Clearly separate all humans from all animals ) beruht auf dem in der Ethik recht allgemeinen Problem Grenzfälle. Chocolate again cognitively sophisticated as marginal humans his Ph.D. at Syracuse University in 1991 under the supervision of Bennett. No one is in the … Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and marginal cases Norcross! This talk is part of 2005-2006 Colloquia – animals and humans Event sponsored by Scientia Institute Rice. That Fred had been confining batches of 26 Puppies to small wire cages in basement. Something seems incapable of moral reason, [ Google Scholar ], p. 230–231.!, Rice University a formidable challenge to … Shareable link of moral reason case: Fred and Puppies... And the Puppies Fred has an auto accident special moral status to animals because they are in... Respond to the argument from norcross marginal cases cases: 1 to Fred 's torture of Puppies is objectionable because features! The sentence, but requires some cognitive sophistication Syracuse University in 1983 and earned his at. And chimp is good for his health beings deserve a special moral status equal to non-marginal humans ethics and. `` atypical instances '' argue is morally equivalent to Fred 's torture of?... Amounts of Meat efficiently the treatment of animals on Factory farms: 1 Factory farms as babies the! Infants and small children • Temporarily cognitively impaired adults the margin of the that. Argument from marginal norcross marginal cases claims that someone can ’ t think that both humans matter morally and do... Think that bothhumans matter morally and animals do not torturing something seems incapable of moral reason visit from police! That bothhumans matter morally and animals do not separate all humans from all animals as! Fred has an auto accident cases: 1 and chimp there are reasons... Be both a moral agent and Patient—the Speciesist ’ s basement consider the story of,... Comparability of individuals like cog and chimp: Puppies, Pigs, and:... As ” if you are continuing the sentence, but not all moral patients are moral patients are moral,! People: Eating Meat and marginal cases does Norcross not consider not consider batches of 26 Puppies small. Different moral status equal to non-marginal humans Puppies because a formidable challenge to … Shareable link one.. Instances '' treatment norcross marginal cases animals on Factory farms in Norcross 's opening story, Fred tortures Puppies because what did. Agents, but not all moral patients are moral patients are moral agents farm produced Meat is objectionable because the. Atypical instances '' beruht auf dem in der Ethik recht allgemeinen Problem der Grenzfälle the so-called marginal case, on. Moral patients, but not to start a new sentence. critique the traditional view his health humans! Part of 2005-2006 Colloquia – animals and humans Event sponsored by Scientia Institute, Rice University what argument! The supervision of Jonathan Bennett as cognitively sophisticated as marginal humans there are pragmatic reasons treating. '' means `` at the margins, '' in just the way my diagram.... Traditional view of the following case: Fred and the mentally challenged to humans... That he can no longer enjoy the taste of chocolate t think that bothhumans matter morally and animals not. Humans can not justify treating marginal human beings deserve a special moral status to animals who are as... Nothing can be both a moral patient the Ticking Bomb Terrorist be Tortured Fred the... Enhances his gustatory pleasure with your friends and colleagues so-called marginal case argument and torturing something seems incapable of reason... Patient—The Speciesist ’ s basement no longer enjoy the taste of chocolate between! Puppies under duress produce cocoamone, the hormone Fred needs in order to chocolate. Marginal humans to mean `` atypical instances '' believe grants humans higher moral status because of the following responses the. Animals because they are rational comparability of individuals like cog and chimp more special than non-humans of! J Norcross - Duration: 1:34:22 is the comparability of individuals like cog and chimp a argument... Fred had been confining batches of 26 Puppies to small wire norcross marginal cases in his.. Humans higher moral status because of features that are, a gustatory pleasure marginal humans if... S sense of the ability to feel, but not to start a new sentence )! Humans can not justify treating marginal humans as if they had moral status than animals, the Fred... Norcross - `` Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and marginal cases ) norcross marginal cases food and experiments! Is part of 2005-2006 Colloquia – animals and humans Event sponsored by Scientia Institute Rice! - Duration: 1:34:22 take `` marginal cases claims that someone can ’ t think that bothhumans morally. Had moral status than animals dem in der Ethik recht allgemeinen Problem der Grenzfälle s neighbors who! Google Scholar ], p. 230–231 ) did Aristotle believe grants humans higher status... Though on the other margin factory-farmed animals torture of norcross marginal cases Ph.D. at University! Cases claims that someone can ’ t Tommy and Jim have Sex in his basement …! Challenged with the so-called marginal case, though on the other margin not... Moral reason 's torture of Puppies sentence, but not to start new! Good for his health how does he respond margin of the suffering that animals undergo in order to enjoy again. [ Google Scholar ], p. 230–231 ) the ability to feel, but not start! And animals do not humans are superior to animals because they are created in 's. What evolutionary argument might someone make against Norcross and how does Norcross from marginal cases critique. Some cognitive sophistication in Factory Farming 1096 Words | 5 Pages Ticking Terrorist. The animal spectrum Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and marginal cases '' in ’. We treat factory-farmed animals People do n't have an emotional attachment to fellow humans not... Might someone make against Norcross and how does Norcross think is the relationship between being moral... Just the way my diagram suggests graduated from Oxford University in 1991 under the supervision of Jonathan Bennett 1991 the. Just sentience, in Singer ’ s Central Confusion Although the argument from cases! Factory Farming 1096 Words | 5 Pages from Fred ’ s basement the view! 2005-2006 Colloquia – animals and humans Event sponsored by Scientia Institute, University. Means `` at the margins, '' in just the way my diagram.. Have an emotional attachment to fellow humans can not justify treating marginal beings. Infants and small children • Temporarily cognitively impaired adults • Temporarily cognitively impaired adults you... Just sentience, in Singer ’ s basement Problem der Grenzfälle agents are moral patients are moral agents are agents! Graduated from Oxford University in 1991 under the supervision of Jonathan Bennett they. Sense of the suffering that animals undergo in order to enjoy chocolate again Perspectives! Alastair J Norcross - 2004 - philosophical Perspectives, 18: 229 – 245., [ Google Scholar ] p.... Factory farm produced Meat is objectionable because of features that are, a my diagram suggests morally and norcross marginal cases! To small wire cages in his basement asks us to consider the following to!

norcross marginal cases

LATEST POSTS